Subscribe | Give a Gift | Subscription Customer Service
How We Are Different Order Back Issues Interactive Glossary Weblog Contact the Staff Subscribe to Woodworking Magazine

Woodworking Magazine Weblog

Posted 4/22/2007 in All Weblog Posts | Electronic Drawings | Workbenches



Building a workbench is a bit like childbirth. Some benches come into this world like my firstborn did, fighting the entire way and taking twice as long as expected – like the English workbench. Other benches are like my second child, where you are done before you know it.

This weekend I’m putting the finishing touches on a workbench inspired by a design shown in Charles Holtzapffel’s “Construction, Action and Application of Cutting Tools Volume II.” I built the bench because it borrows the best features from three traditions: It has massive French bones with both English and German workholding. Holtzapffel himself was a reflection of this bench, a German who lived and worked in England.

This bench was very easy and fast to build. I’ve logged only 35 hours of shop time on this bench so far and have only a couple hours of work ahead of me – mostly cleaning off pencil marks and applying a finish.

Here are some of the details of the bench. I’ll be publishing a full version of the construction details of this bench that will be available by summer, but you can download the (admittedly rough) construction drawing below.

The bench is 6' long, 24" deep and 34" high. The 3"-thick top is ash, with the base and vise chops made using hard maple. All the joints are traditional drawbored mortises and tenons. The legs and stretchers are all flush with the front (and rear) edge of the top.

The face vise is a twin-screw, with 24" between the two wooden screws. The wooden screws are 2" in diameter and move very quickly. I bought the screws off of another woodworker who lives in California. He had bought them off another guy many years ago. In other words, I don’t know where you can get another set for yourself. But I’m working on that issue right now.

The chop for the face vise (the big wooden part) is lined with leather, and both legs are bored with ¾" holes for holdfasts to support work from below. I’ve always been intrigued by vises with wooden screws, and I can report that they are remarkable. I’ve been working with this vise as the bench has come together and the wooden screws have tenacious holding power. It’s also nice that your work doesn’t get marked with grease, which happens with metal-screwed vises.


The end vise is my own doing – Holtzapffel showed a proper tail vise. I used a quick-release vise with a massive (2-3/4" x 13-1/2") maple chop. Usually, I don’t much care for quick-release vises, especially in the face vise position. The screws and guide bars prohibit you from doing many useful cabinetmaking operations, such as dovetailing.

But a quick-release vise used in the end-vise position is a fantastic proposition. The large chop and its accessory dog give you lots of support below your work. And because I bored the dog holes in the top on 3-3/8" centers, virtually all of my work is supported from below no matter how long or short it is.

You’ll notice that there’s no sliding deadman on this bench. My theory here is that I’m not going to need it, though I have built in a track for a deadman in case I am wrong. I think the twin screw and the holes in the legs will offer all the support I need for working on edges and ends of boards.

All three of the workbenches I’ve built recently, the French-style Roubo bench, the English-style Nicholson bench and the Holtzapffel cabinetmaker's bench, perform all the basic woodworking operations that a bench should. But each has a slightly different personality. So picking a favorite bench is like asking which of my children I love more. I can’t do it. They’re all good. They’re all different.

HoltzapffelBench.pdf (35.47 KB)

— Christopher Schwarz

4/23/2007 1:34:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Nice Bench! Beefy and versatile. Though I would have figured you'd use the
ash for the base and the hard maple for the top.
4/23/2007 9:41:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Hi Chris,

Is there any reason the Lee Valley twin screw vice wouldn't work well for this bench? Does this design fall into the category of bench that works well with both hand and power tool usage?
Pete
4/23/2007 9:50:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
As to materials: Ash and maple are both excellent choices for a benchtop or base. Look up the e values (stiffness) of each species and you'll see that either is ideal.

I think the real shocker is that I didn't use Southern Yellow pine to build the bench.

As to the question about vise screws: The Lee Valley ones would work brilliantly, as would any vise screw. I chose the wooden ones only for the sake of experimentation. (But boy are they cool.)

This bench is ideal for both hand and power work. All the basic hand operations are supported (dovetailing, planing, general sawing). And the top is a wide-open clamping surface for routing, biscuiting, screw-driving etc. It's a worthy design for the hybrid woodworker (like me).

Chris
4/23/2007 9:55:15 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Chris,
I like this bench alot. What are the 4 larger holes at the front vise and end vise for? Also, why did you stray away from southern yellow pine on this bench? Did you make it 3" thick because of the difficulties using the bench dogs in a 4" top?
4/23/2007 11:23:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Tim,

The holes you are referring to are for bolts and washers. The four holes at the end hold the quick-release vise. The four by the face vise secure the two threaded blocks for the twin-screw vise. After years of dealing with some vises that used lag screws and those that used bolts, I'm a bolt man.

As to the choice of materials, it was what I had on hand that was stiff, plentiful, heavy and cheap. I think I paid $125 for all the wood – and I had enough left over to make the leg vise for the Nicholson bench, a big planing board (see an earlier post) and some houses for my kids' WebKinz.

As to the thickness of the top, it was dictated by the material. I went as thick as possible. I can get most holdfasts to work in a 4" top. The 3" tops are about the same.

It is a fine bench. I've been working with it all evening.

Chris
4/24/2007 9:01:40 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
125 bucks for all the wood on a thick solid hardwood bench. That's an
excellent deal! Looking forward to the writeup on PW.
4/24/2007 11:45:39 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Chris,

Very nice looking WB. I wonder, should the face vise and the tail vise be shifted for a lefty user. I mean the face vise to the right leg and the tail vise to the left end. (gess that the sequence of the holes too!)
4/24/2007 12:27:46 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Exactly right. When planing edges you always want to be working into the vise's screws. This prevents you from pulling the work out of the vise with the force of the tool.

Some lefties plane right-handed, however, so make sure you're not one of those.
4/25/2007 4:30:08 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
I've followed your bench journey and you have made several nice benches, and have done a lot of research.

There's a lot of european influence in your research, and all of your benches were made from different geos, which you've adapted to be reasonably assembled by most average hobbiest. You have inspired many folks to build their own bench, My hat is off to you!

What I am curious of is what specific influence was introduced in America, prior to the last of what many refer to as the 2nd Industrial Revolution? IOW, before the point when electric motors were introduced around 1907-1908, how did America change the designs of their forefathers? Most settlers came here from Europe, and their skills allowed those folks to create interesting things in America, witness the hand hewn dovetailed homes built in the Appalacian style which seem like they were heavily influenced by the german/irish joinery around the north eastern area of the U.S. Yet the Appalacian homes were an improvement in the joinery, and the half dovetail is wonderful in how it sheds water.

Some of the shaker benches were very big, I wonder if this was influenced in any way by the readily available hand planes that were manufactured in the U.S.? I suppose what I'm really wondering is if any benches were created to meet the chanegs which were introduced in America, and specifically prior to the later half of the 2 wave of the Industrial Revolution (the first being in England), when electric motors took hold.

After electric motors were incorporated in woodworking machines, the requirements would change by a magnitude, that is why I mention the time prior to it.

Was it the large shaker style benches that were an artifact of America? Or were they European influenced also?

Cheers,
Alan DuBoff
4/25/2007 7:27:37 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Alan,

Your question touches on a lot of points. I have some thoughts on the matter that might be worth consideration.

1. Early benches, both in America and Europe, were longer than modern Industrial Revolution benches. Benches that are 8' and 10' (even 14') long were more common, and this is somewhat a reflection of the needs of house joiner or carpenter. These benches were not manufactured, but were craftsman-made.

2. Benches became smaller, lighter and less useful (in my opinion) as the manual training movement and machinery became ascendant. The Industrial Revolution created less of a need for large benches that were designed for traditional work. Plus the Industrial Revolution created the manual training movement (shop class), and the workbench-building industry. Benches needed to be manufactured for shop classes and they had to be shipped flat by rail.

3. Traditional workbenches (English and French designs especially) don't lend themselves to manufacturing or shipping. But the European design does (it's an adapted version of a German bench). Early (and modern) workbench catalogs are filled with European-style benches. I have only one catalog (a French one) that sells French benches.

4. The Shaker-style of workbench isn't an isolated anomaly. There were plenty of English designs (for home craftsmen in particular) that were very keen on storing stuff. One English bench design looked more like a tool chest, and it even had a foot-powered table saw built into it. Plus, there are plenty of catalogs that have benches that are as much about storing tools as they are about holding your work.

Chris
4/25/2007 2:37:36 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Hi Chris,

Nice bench!

I couldn't find the overall length dimension on your plans.

Yes, I know, minor details...

Thank you for sharing...
Joe
4/25/2007 2:41:16 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

It's in the text above (6')

Chris
4/25/2007 10:58:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Man I wish I had your job [big stupid grin]. Instead I get to work in my shop about an hour and a half a day if I am lucky. ON weekends I might log ten hours. Ah well. I may never own a nice bench like that, but I must compliment the artistry. Thanks for showing it off.

Phil
4/26/2007 7:29:25 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Chris,

From your response I gather that benches continue to get shorter, and it seems apparent in the benches that woodworkers are building these days. Interesting that your bench here is 6', that seems to be a popular size these days. Lon Schleining's bench from FWW #167 (Tools & Shops issue) seems to be a very popular design amongst woodworkers, and what I had started to design my bench on...that is until I wanted to personalize it and then I started making modifications. I see the smaller size as being more convenient for woodworkers, and the reason I'm going with a shorter bench is space limitations where I want to put the bench.

I'd like to hear if you see any difference in building a tredle style base, or one that has 4 post legs, like the bench here? Since most tredle bases have 4 feet on them anyway, I don't see how that would make too much difference, but wanted to get your thoughts.

To some extent I think most woodworkers build a bench that suites them, and use it as a tool. Like any tool, none are perfect. The best woodworkers learn how to use their tools to best meet their needs. I'm sure that many will be unhappy with their first, second, or even third bench...but will have learned some of the things they do and do not like about each one. As I build my bench, I ponder adding an extra leg vise, just for the heck of it. Never seems that any woodworker can have too many ways to hold their work, and a removable leg vise would add value, yet allow one to take it off when not needed (i.e., clamp work to the same area of the bench in a different fashion.

Will you be building any other benches that will be in your book?

Regards,
Alan DuBoff
5/5/2007 9:49:58 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Chris,
Where did you get the quick release end vise? Is it your record from your old yellow pine bench or is it a new Anant brand vise? Thanks Tim
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

 Copyright © 2005 F+W Publications Inc. All rights reserved.